Netanyahu for President of America
Posted on 15. Dec, 2011 by Alan Hart in Israel
By Alan Hart
It’s now clear that the Republican frontrunner in the race for the White House is Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu.
Officially the two Republican frontrunners are Newt “the Palestinians are an invented people” Gingrich and Mitt “Obama has pushed Israel under a bus” Romney.
Both are political whores locked in a competition of their own as well as with President Obama for Zionist lobby organized campaign funds and American Jewish votes. (In a very close election race the latter could determine who becomes president).
The probability is that Romney will emerge as the winner and be the one to take on Obama. So what Romney said in the last debate with the other Republican candidates is of critical importance. He said:
“If I was president I’d get on the ‘phone to Bibi and say ‘Would it help if I said this?’”
In other words, if Romney becomes president, Netanyahu will the one determining American foreign policy for Israel-Palestine.
Because of Obama’s first-term surrender to the Zionist lobby and its stooges in Congress there’s a case for saying that Netanyahu already is, effectively, the president of America so far as policy for Israel-Palestine is concerned.
So is there no prospect of next November’s election producing a president who will be prepared to put America’s own real interests first by confronting the Zionist monster?
If the Republicans get the key to the White House the answer will be “No”, because a first-term Republican president will not want to destroy his prospects for a second term by making an enemy of the Zionist lobby and its fundamentalist (deluded, even mad)) Christian partners.
But in my view there is a possibility that a second-term Obama might use the leverage all American presidents have to get a real peace process going, even if that means, as it would, challenging the Zionist lobby’s stooges in Congress to decide whether they are Americans first or not. (Those who are not could be condemned and prosecuted as traitors).
It’s not often that I find myself in agreement with anything written by the New York Times’ op-ed columnist Thomas L. Friedman, but his latest piece under the headline Newt, Mitt, Bibi and Vladimir is a great contribution to the debate about what he calls the “grovelling” to the Zionist lobby of the Republican would-be presidents. (Friedman actually calls it the “Israel lobby”, but as I never tire of saying, that’s not an accurate description of the monster. Israel lobby implies that it speaks for all Israelis and it does not).
Here’s part of what he wrote about the would-be Republican presidents in their last debate.
“Newt Gingrich took the Republican competition to grovel for Jewish votes – by out loving Israel – to a new low by suggesting that the Palestinians are an ‘invented’ people and not a real nation entitled to a state.
“This was supposed to show that Newt loves Israel more than Mitt Romney, who only told the Israeli newspaper Israel Hayom that he would move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem because ‘I don’t seek to take actions independent of what our allies think is best, and if Israel’s leaders thought that a move of that nature would be helpful to their efforts, then that’s something I’ll be inclined to do. … I don’t think America should play the role of the leader of the peace process. Instead, we should stand by our ally.’”
Friedman’s comment on that Romney contribution was:
“That’s right. America’s role is to just applaud whatever Israel does, serve as its A.T.M. and shut up. We have no interests of our own. And this guy’s running for president?”
Then Friedman considered the implications of Gingrich’s stated position.
“As for Newt, well, let’s see. If the 2.5 million West Bank Palestinians are not a real people entitled to their own state, that must mean Israel is entitled to permanently occupy the West Bank and that must mean – as far as Newt is concerned – that Israel’s choices are: (1) to permanently deprive the West Bank Palestinians of Israeli citizenship and put Israel on the road to apartheid; (2) to evict the West Bank Palestinians through ethnic cleansing and put Israel on the road to the International Criminal Court in the Hague; or (3) to treat the Palestinians in the West Bank as citizens, just like Israeli Arabs, and lay the foundation for Israel to become a bi-national state. And this is called being ‘pro-Israel’?”
Friedman also had something to say about Netanyahu.
“I sure hope he understands that the standing ovation he got in Congress this year was not for his politics. That ovation was bought and paid for by the Israel lobby.”
And about his own position and American Jews in general
Friedman wrote this:
“I’d never claim to speak for American Jews, but I’m certain there are many out there like me, who strongly believe in the right of the Jewish people to a state, who understand that Israel lives in a dangerous neighbourhood yet remains a democracy (for how much longer, I ask?) but who are deeply worried about where Israel is going today. My guess is we’re the minority when it comes to secular American Jews. We still care. Many other Jews are just drifting away.”
If many American Jews really are drifting away from support for Israel right or wrong, that could make taking on and defeating the Zionist lobby a more manageable proposition for a second-term President Obama.
Footnote:
I am in the process of writing a considered piece with the headline The Zionization of American politics and how it could be terminated. It will be ready for publication at the start of the New Year.
a WordPress rating system
8 Responses to “Netanyahu for President of America”
Leave a Reply
Join Us
 |
| Subscribe to Opinion Maker |
| Email: |
Author Profile
Alan Hart
Netanyahu for President of America | Set You Free News
15. Dec, 2011
[...] Netanyahu for President of America Politics World — 15 December 2011 // By Alan Hart Opinion Maker [...]
Bibi in 2012 - Fight The Law
15. Dec, 2011
[...] SOURCE Tagged with: 2012 • alan hart • alex jones • bibi • charlotte iserbyt • drudge report • exposinthetruth.info • fightthelaw.org • frontrunner • henry makow • infowars.com • inrich • israel • mitt romney • netanyahu • new world order • nowtheendbegins • obama • palestinians • pecangroup.org • policical • president • republican • stevequayle If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it! [...]
Denny
15. Dec, 2011
How about tweaking the book title and contents just a bit to read "The Zionization of American Politics and How It Could Be Terminated In 180 Days Or Less". I'm afraid that's about all the time we have and that may be stretching it.
prince of Israel
15. Dec, 2011
You surely aren't so ignorant as to not realize the American Revolution was financed by a "zionist". (Like they say, if you want to know how it all started, follow the money!)
Yes, surely Haym Salomon prime financier of the revolution, son of a Jewish Rabbi, with his geopolitical vision would promote the Judaising of the Jewish state, and had he the opportunity, he would have funded the battle and establishment of Israel, as he did the revolution and establishment of the United States of America!!!
As stated by John Adams "The Hebrews contributed more to the civilizing of humanity than any other people".
I might add, the Jews were no less instrumental and influential in keeping the union intact during the civil war and supporting emancipation.
Israel is first and foremost the country of the Jews.
I say a little appreciation and not so much nit-picking is appropriate.
America would be alot better off with Netanyahu than Obama!
Good day.
HE ALREADY IS
15. Dec, 2011
HE ALREADY IS, OBAMA IS JUST A PUPPET.
Yusuf bin Jussac (Joe Jussac, Jr.)
16. Dec, 2011
DITTO!!! Obama MORON is a mere stupid lunatic puppet of IsraHell! C me at http://www.scribd.com/tjoaginsing soon to be shut down by the Z in the Jewnited Snakes of AskheNazi. Do it, I’ve got nothing to lose dudes!
Shalom/Salaam!
ad
15. Dec, 2011
Why didn't you mention Ron Paul in this once? You say all republicans would kiss Israel's butt? Not Ron Paul buddy, he lives and work for America First, not IsRaHell.
senior intelligente
16. Dec, 2011
What ?! No mention of Ron Paul? Everyone knows RP is the man!! He would tell Netenyahoo to do whatever he wants just leave the USA out of it, and no, you will not be receiveing $3Billion anymore.